How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
Blog Article
What is Absolutely everyone finding great accuracy with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just trying to find a starting point so I don't squander lots of parts. Thanks for the assistance!
Needless to say, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different ton numbers, but I do think I understand why. It is a litigation-driven globe, plus some fool would surely deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and think of his personal custom combination of powder. What a environment.
The fact that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you happen to be looking at better velocities attained with that powder, versus That which you've noticed with the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but fairly better suited to a bit smaller circumstances with a little bit significantly less capacity.
Warning employing SC or SSC designed loads with prolonged Lower, back off and work up. Use Protected loading strategies.
My working experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to exactly the same weight as the extensive Slash demonstrates a reduced velocity.
It is really possible that no further more dialogue is required, in which circumstance we propose starting off a whole new thread. If nonetheless you feel your response is necessary you may even now do so.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Possess a limited supply of Varget, as well as a whole lot additional available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, since that is certainly exactly what the rifles shoot the very best.
Like explained above, identical things. Everything is different is the dimensions in the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they are going to only make the SC Later on. I have no idea if that may be correct or not but would sound right to me. I exploit SC simply because that is certainly what I located in h4831sc load data the eight lb jug and it really works.
I've found the exact reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally accurate powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
Additionally, it goes on to mention that because of the fshorter grains, that load density could be a little bit higher.
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They're the identical/similar powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
Just after reading this text (and many Some others, but this just one is the most data driven with several accredited shooters) I have h4831sc stopped stressing about touching or getting inside of a magical distance through the lands, and commenced loading wherever I could enhance various areas of a load. Just my .02, with any h4831 vs h4831sc luck , you will get some thing to work for ya.
I commonly usually receive the sc Variation. Using a powder measure it hangs up a lot less due to shorter kernels and I feel lets more steady metering so a lot less time you are taking trickling in the last bit of charge to generate pounds. So basically the SC saves you instances
IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinct. In which you will be baffling it and believing that it is actually shut is H4831 and H4831SC are really identical. Those two are pretty much exactly the same except H4831SC is made to smaller grains so it meters simpler.